Robert M.N.
Palmer, The Law Offices of Robert M.N. Palmer, P.C. and Gary A.
Tatlow, Tatlow, Gump & Faiella, L.L.C., for Plaintiffs; and
Rodney Loomer, Turner, Reid, Duncan, Loomer & Patton for
Defendant General Motors Corporation and Jeffrey Parshall,
Knight, Ford, Wright, Atwill, et al., for Defendant Davis.
Jacob Johnson, age 5, sustained a serious closed head injury
from a head-on motor vehicle accident on February 22, 1996.
Jacob was wearing the lap and shoulder passive restraint
provided for the front passenger seat in the 1992 Chevrolet
Lumina being driven by his father Gerald Johnson when it was
struck by a 1985 Ford Escort being driven by James Davis. Mr.
Davis, for reasons unknown, crossed the center line of Highway
JJ in Randolph County Missouri resulting in a frontal offset
collision. It was agreed by both parties that the delta-V
(deceleration velocity) was approximately 30 mph. The passive
lap and shoulder belt provided in the Chevy Lumina permitted
Jacob Johnson to move forward excessively so that he was able to
strike his head on the instrument panel and thereby receiving
his brain damage. Mr. Johnson, who was also wearing the
automatic lap and shoulder belt, received a dislocated hip from
which he has fully recovered. Mr. Davis, who was completely
unrestrained during the accident, also received a dislocated hip
from which he has completely recovered.
Plaintiffs sued
General Motors on the theories of strict liability, negligence
and failure to warn. Through evidence developed by plaintiffs
during discovery it was determined that General Motors was aware
that the particular restraint system in the Chevy Lumina ("W"
car) did not adequately restrain small occupants. General Motors
engineers had suggested a number of changes for the 1992 Chevy
Lumina, none of which were implemented. Honda had in fact
employed many of these alternative designs on its vehicle with a
similar belt system. General Motor's own engineers observed that
the Honda restraint system provided much better restraint to
small occupants than did that of the Chevy Lumina. Plaintiffs
were therefore suing General Motors on the theory that the
restraint system in the Chevy Lumina was defective and
unreasonably dangerous, and that had it been designed properly,
Jacob Johnson would have sustained only minor injuries. Further,
plaintiffs were pursuing the theory of failure to warn in that
nowhere in the car or owners manual did General Motors warn that
smaller occupants, especially children, should ride in the back
seat, despite the overwhelming evidence that General Motors was
aware of the dangers for small occupants in the front seat.
Medical expenses
at the time of settlement were $220,629.84
Case settled
for a confidential amount on February 11, 2000.